I saw your post all on it's lonesome so I figure I should reply just to keep it company :love: :love: :love:
Why thank you, Chimpster. I was beginning to think that no one liked it and was giving it the cold shoulder. Meany click threads that they are!
No toaster would get me. I am the toaster wrecker!! (I've broken 2 at work in 2 seperate Pop Tart related incidents) Saz Toaster Assassin
Aye, pop tarts are mighty weapons, they are. As to the original question, death by toaster would be toasticular manslaughter. Homicide is the umbrella category that encompasses the various types of murder and manslaughter.
But if the toaster was evil and meant to do this, then it is not accidental, but on purpose and is therefore toasticular murder 1 . Although toasticular homicide does sound alot better.
Aye, that is true, pre-planning would make it murder 1. Now, if the toaster was driving a car when he killed you, that would be toasticular vehicular manslaughter, which rolls off the tongue pleasantly in spite of, well, its unpleasantness. How strange.
Two competely seperate Pop Tart incidents, oh my. Dare we ask? Yes, toasticular murder 1 just doens't seem nearly as satisfying as toasticular homicide. And I almost was toast! But just in case I still have my halo. :Angel:
