Speaking of Stephen King, as I understand it, HE thought that Frank Darabont's ending to the film "The Mist" was better than the ending that he (King) wrote for the novelette. Personally, Darabont's ending made me want to drink myself to death. Not because it was bad. It was a very effective ending, but way, way too nihilistic for me. Spoiler At the end of King's story, the outcome is uncertain, but there's hope. At the end of Darabont's version, overall there's hope, but on a personal level, it's Scorched Earth.
Are you talking about the classic cartoon us older people grew up with or the Jim Carrey flick? Oh good point. Kids films! Shrek!!! Shrek was much better than the original picture book!
I laughed at that film. It was hilarious. They are very very different. Different time-era, different character (Bourne is complex and unsure in the book), *Spoiler* Marie doesn't die, Conklin actually helps Bourne and DOESN'T die. Which reminds me, Train Spotting and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. And in your next post complain about Life of Brian being too preachy A lot of people calling out LOTR series too. I can't agree. They are on par for me. If you say the extended editions then I'd say the films *might* be better. You have to remember though that the films are so detailed only because of the amount of depth that Tolkien put into Middle Earth.
Best ones have already been said. Godfather one and 2 made great art from trash, The Lord Of The Rings trilogy also. The book is several hundred pages longer than it needs to be and gets to be a bit of a slog.
Oh, I wouldn't call it trash; I actually quite enjoyed it when I read it but the movie's miles better.
Jason and the argonauts(1963,animation by Ray Harryhausen)brought to life what were some fairly dry Greek classics.
I'm reading The Wanderers at the moment. I might give the DVD a spin after and see which I prefer. I believe Warriors is biased on a book too, might do the same with that. A film that is clearly better than the book...Deliverance.
lol. i take issue with "dry", as a greek and a reader. i love greek mythology. what's "dry" about it usually is how the material is presented in school. have you ever read the iliad or the odyssey? that stuff is da bomb.
I'm really struggling to think of any film adaptations which were better than the book they were based on. I agree that it does apply to The Godfather, but in fairness the film is VERY different from the book. I think that the film of Marathon Man is equally as good as the book. It's a very faithful vesion overall - except for the twist at the end. But I'm not certain which ending I actually prefer.
This would probably get me strung up by the literary world but Oliver!(1968)starring amongst others Ron Moody,Oliver Reed,Harry Secombe,Mark Lester ,Leonard Rossiter with music by Lionel Bart is at least as dark and brutal as the book,certainly the best of the screen adaptions.
Aye, it took me forever to think of one, but I got it: Disney's "Mary Poppins" is better than the book, or, actually, books, as there are more than one.
:ban: Troy was an affront to one of the greatest pieces of literature EVER! Gross oversimplifications of the complexities of the story. Basically, dumbed down.
Or dry is a result of poor translations. I remember buying a cheap version of one of the plays a few years ago. The very same thing that was brilliant with a better translation came off very poorly in the cheap version. I am a big fan of the Richmond Lattimore translations myself. Those are the ones I own.