Article: Do U.K. Gun Laws Curb Crimes?

Discussion in 'Off Topic Area' started by Nevada_MO_Guy, Dec 5, 2005.

  1. Mitch

    Mitch Lord Mitch of MAP Admin

    To address the gun deaths issue specifically:

    Number of deaths from firearms injury United Kingdom, 1994 to 2003


    1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
    341 358 254 201 203 210 204 167 169 163

    All data provided during Parliamentary Answers in 2004.

    Gun Crime:
    Of 24,070 offences in England and Wales in 2002/3, 57% involved air weapons. The biggest increase in offences was those involving replica guns which went up 46% to 1815.

    Source:Criminal statistics England and Wales 2002/2003. Supplementary Volume 1. Homicide and Gun Crime (edited by David Povey). National Statistics. January 2004

    So:
    Gun deaths in the UK are half their 1994 level.
    The biggest increase in gun crime offences is in the use of replica guns.
    Most gun crime involved air guns.

    So that gun-control legislation of ours isn't working huh? Sounds suspiciously like it is both working (deaths reducing) and that real guns are getting harder to get hold of as a result (increased use of replicas and airguns).

    Mitch
     
  2. Nevada_MO_Guy

    Nevada_MO_Guy Missouri_Karate_Guy

    Guns can also bring people together as a sport or hobby, for fun.

    The Olympic games offer shooting. Unfortunately, the citizens of Britain currently don't have the freedom to practice in Britain.

    It looks like they may get a chance in the future. http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/10-6-2005-78312.asp

    Even though citizens of Britain have to leave the country to practice, they have still managed to win gold medals. Very impressive.

    I wonder how well they would do if they had the freedom to practice at home?
     
  3. Wax

    Wax Valued Member

    Man, Nevada, your right. Damn the risk of being shot by a strung out junkie, lets think about our gold medals!

    *sigh*
     
  4. Pacificshore

    Pacificshore Hit n RUN!

    Story from the Sunday Times (12-04-05)

    Picked this story up off another forum I frequent. It is not so much about the UK gun law, but the differences and lack of training in Officer Safety from a former US Police Officer that moved back to the UK to be with his fiance, and became a Constable. I thought it would fit well with this topic.

    The Sunday Times - Britain December 04, 2005

    US cop quits 'too risky' UK force
    David Leppard

    A TEXAN patrol officer who became the first foreigner to join the British police is to resign after three years because he says policing is too dangerous here compared with America.

    Ben Johnson, a 6ft 4in former paratrooper nicknamed Slim, has written to his chief constable asking to carry a Glock 17 handgun on his routine beat in Reading.

    He said officers are dying unnecessarily because they are less well equipped and trained to protect themselves and the public than their American counterparts.

    “The risks required to be taken by unarmed and poorly trained British police are too great for me to continue being a police officer and I will be resigning my commission in a few weeks,” said Johnson.

    “I am tired of my colleagues dying when, if they were better trained and equipped, they would have a fighting chance of survival.”

    Johnson’s decision was prompted by the murder of PC Sharon Beshenivsky, a mother of three children and two step-children, who was shot during a robbery in Bradford last month. He said her death demonstrated the lack of training and equipment given to British police.

    “Beshenivsky did the one thing that officers in America are trained not to do. She walked up to the front entrance of a business during an alarm call. If the incident had happened in America, she would never have done that. She would almost certainly have been alive today.”

    Last week Johnson wrote to Sara Thornton, acting chief constable of Thames Valley police, asking to be armed on patrol. “If the chief authorises me to carry a pistol, then I will not be resigning,” he said. “But that is an impossibility. I now have the choice of continuing in a dangerous job, ill-trained and ill-equipped, or leaving the profession I have loved.”

    Johnson, 34, served as a paratrooper in the American army before joining the police department in Garland, a Dallas suburb. Like other officers he carried a Glock 22 pistol as a sidearm, supported by a 12-bore shotgun and an AR15 semi-automatic rifle in his patrol car. In America he routinely confronted armed criminals and received 10 commendations for his bravery.

    He came to Britain three years ago to live with his fiancée Louise, an IT consultant. He was able to join the Thames Valley force because of a change in regulations that lifted the bar on foreigners.

    The couple are now married and Johnson has taken a short career break to look after their 18-month-old daughter Catherine. He said fatherhood had changed his perspective. “It would not be fair [to my family] to continue in a job that is being made more dangerous by a refusal to modernise,” he said.

    It was an incident earlier this year that first caused Johnson to consider handing in his warrant card. He was on plainclothes CID duty when he was called to the Royal Berkshire hospital in Reading to interview a victim of domestic violence.

    A woman had jumped out of a first-floor window to escape her violent boyfriend, paralysing her from the waist down. The boyfriend, a member of a drug gang, was already wanted by the police for attempted murder, after shooting someone in the back of the head in London.

    Johnson and other plainclothes officers who went to the hospital were alerted that the boyfriend had telephoned to say he was coming to see her. They also received a warning that he might be armed.

    According to Johnson, he wanted to arrest the man when he arrived, but was ordered by a senior officer not to do so because of the risk. The suspect escaped and it was two days before he was arrested.

    “That was the first time I’d ever let someone wanted for attempted murder simply walk away from me,” said Johnson. “It went against everything I knew. I thought it was my duty to arrest these people.

    “It seems that in Britain ordinary officers are instructed not to engage with dangerous criminals. But if police officers can’t engage with them, who can?” He is critical of Charles Clarke, the home secretary, who says he can see “no evidence” that arming officers would reduce the number of police fatalities. “With all respect to the home secretary, he has never answered a 999 call,” said Johnson.

    Of Beshenivsky’s murder, he said: “I have been in exactly those situations on patrol in America and I have managed to arrest and disarm offenders without being harmed.”

    In America, officers spend weeks learning how to cope with armed incidents. But in Britain, Johnson said, he was never shown how to handle or unload a firearm or told how to respond to an armed robbery. “Officers spend more time learning about how to process paperwork than dealing with violent situations. We are trained more like social workers than police officers.

    “The training I received in Britain in dealing with armed incidents was virtually non-existent. It consisted of a 30-minute lecture from a firearms officer who said: ‘If you see the business end of a gun or anyone holding a gun . . . turn, run and get away as quickly as possible’.”

    This apparent complacency was reinforced at his swearing-in ceremony when a senior Thames Valley officer told him and colleagues that they would not face the sort of dangerous incidents portrayed on The Bill, the television programme.

    “I was surprised that he said we wouldn’t come into harm’s way. This went against everything I had learnt during my career,” said Johnson.

    By contrast, the chief officer of Garland police department tells new recruits that it is his task to ensure they are prepared and equipped to face any threat.

    Johnson accepted that America is more violent than Britain, with a gun culture contributing to a murder rate 17 times higher than here. He recognised, too, that many more police officers are murdered in America — 57 last year compared with just one here — proportionately about 11 times as many.

    But he maintained that British police are far more exposed to danger when confronted with armed offenders than their US counterparts. He said he did not want all police armed — just the “first responders”, officers who, like Beshenivsky, are first on the scene of crimes. He believed this would mean arming about half of Britain’s 140,000 police.

    A spokesman for Thames Valley police said: “PC Johnson is currently on a career break. These are his personal views and he did not discuss them with anyone before going to the press.”
    __________________
     
  5. jonmonk

    jonmonk New Member

    Reading that article it looks like people interested in shooting as a sport would still be able to do that. You know these laws are about control of guns and not necessarily the banning of guns. You can still go clay pidgeon shooting for example. It looks like a reasonable compromise to me and remember that the types of pistols used in sport shooting are usually highly specialised and are not the same as the ones used in crime.

    There are lots of hobbies that people can have to bring them together. You don't need to get rid of gun control laws to do that.
     
  6. holyheadjch

    holyheadjch Valued Member

    I imagine that story took the decision to quit out of his hands. Sounds like a moron to me, if every police officer was armed, it would encourage criminals to arm themselves, a US Police Officer is 11 times more likely to be killed and he calls UK Policing dangerous...what an idiot.
     

Share This Page